Pressure Cooker Review: Fagor Futuro - 3.8 Very Good

fagor futuro review
The Futuro is instantly recognizable with its art-deco style handles and wide curvy base that is just asking for a roast.  Fagor's Futuro does alot of things right - but  some functionality takes you by surprise -literally!


Fagor futuro pressure release

Features: (3.5 out of 5 stars)
  • Wide Base - While the opening is standard for a 6L/qt  pressure cooker 8.8" (22.5 cm) at its widest point this pressure cooker is 9.25" (23.5 cm)! A half inch (1cm) does not sound like much, but when other pressure cookers, like the Fissler Vitavit, have an interior that is narrower than the opening a half  inch difference starts to look like 2" (5 cm)!
  • Short Handles -  I prefer pressure cookers with short handles, but the handles on the Futuro look so much alike, that I'm always trying to put the top on the wrong handle - a very small inconvenience for not having  a long handle sticking out over a flame of the next burner or  sticking out where my kids can reach them easily.
  • Easy-cleaning valve - It really does just spin out and pop into your hand in a single piece that you can run under the water in your sink. But.. (see Clean-up section)


fagor futuro features

Unfortunately, the Fagor Futuro lacks one feature that is standard in most modern - and even first-generation pressure cookers - a maximum fill line. Although expert cooks can eye-ball it someone who is new to pressure cooking might have a difficult time deciding where exactly 2/3 capacity might be, and then half capacity for pressure cooking foamy or foods that expand, like legumes and  grains.

Safety:  (4.5 out of 5 stars)

The Futuro would have gotten 5 out of 5 stars in this category, if there had been a maximum capacity fill line - an important guide to ensure that food particles do not interfere with the operation of the pressure and safety valves. Although the manual lists only three, I have found this pressure cooker to have four safety mechanisms.
  1. Primary Over-Pressure Release - Integrated in the pressure release valve, releases pressure in case that it rises above the selected pressure.
  2. Secondary Safety Valve- Located under the lid handle, kicks in if the first is not able to reduce excess pressure (in case the first is clogged or the pressure is too high).
  3. Self-locking handle - The pressure cooker will lock closed when it begins to reach pressure, and will not allow you to open it until all pressure has been released.
  4. Safety vent - in case the first two safety mechanisms should fail, the gasket will buckle and allow pressure (and some of the contents of the pressure cooker) through the metal cut-out in the lid. Always point this little window in the rim away from you while operating the pressure cooker.

Fagor Futuro Safety Features

Performance:   (3 out of 5 stars)

I have a love-hate relationship with the pressure regulator of the the Fagor Futuro.

I love the selection and release, but hate the indicator and regulator.

Pressure selection is a snap with big numbers and a lever to choose the needed pressure:  1-Low Pressure (8psi) or 2- High Pressure (15psi).

fagor futuro pressure valveThe pressure indicator, a little yellow thing buried in the handle, is too quiet and imprecise.  It will pop up when the pan is reaching pressure, not when the selected pressure has been reached.  Turning down the heat at the first sight of the yellow signal, as is customary,  could mean a loss of pressure.  Instead, you are supposed to wait until the valve goes into over-pressure and starts spewing out vapor, before turning the heat down.  I've taken to touching the raised signal with my finger - if it has "give" or falls back down the pan has not reached pressure.  But if it is solid to the touch then the pan has reached pressure.  Unlike other pressure cookers tested, the Futuro is so quiet that it will not make a bunch of noise when it has reached over-pressure and it's time to turn down the heat. Getting this pan up to pressure requires a fair bit of monitoring.

Although this valve appears to emit quite a bit more vapor than its peers during operation. The numbers tell a different story.  In my tests the Fagor Futuro has an average 3.5% evaporation,  the same as the Kuhn Rikon Duromatic.

However,  the heat required to maintain pressure is higher than the Kuhn Rikon Duromatic (knob position 2.75 vs. 1.6 )  - which makes this pressure cooker grossly less energy efficient than its peers.

When pressure cooking is finished, I love this pressure cooker all over again. When it's time to release pressure, I just need to flick  the pressure selector to "release" and a diffused, wide, low-noise cloud  shoots straight up into the exhaust fan above my cooktop.  Why would such an intuitive function be something I love about this pressure cooker?!?  Well, other high-end pressure cookers require you to turn something slowly, or push a button and lever and stand there for two minutes while the pressure cooker de-pressurizes shooting vapor in every possible direction except for where it would make the most sense.


Clean-up:  (4 out 5 stars)
base is dishwasher safe
  • Valve comes out easily 
  • Gasket easy to remove and hand wash 
  • Lid should be hand-washed, only 
  • Base is dishwasher safe but hand washing is recommended. 

The valve is really easy to remove for regular, fast cleaning, but there are some nooks and crannies underneath where the system attaches to the pan, that can only be reached by un-screwing the top part of the pressure cooker... and it takes a Ph.D. in Fagor construction to figure out how to put it back correctly. However, depending on the use (and I use this pan alot), you would only be faced with this about once a year (or after a particularly messy experiment).

The total weight of the Futuro Pressure cooker base is about half a pound (200g) less than equivalent -sized Fissler Vitavit  and Kuhn Rikon Duromatic Pressure cooker bases, and you can really feel the difference when it's time to clean it. I found the Fagor Futuro stainless steel a little "stickier" than other pressure cookers I have tested so far. This means that you will need to use a little extra elbow grease after pressure cooking a particularly caramellized meal.

Accessories 


The Futuro comes standard with a trivet and  stainless steel steamer basket.  Like the base, the steamer basket is the widest I've seen in pressure cookers of equivalent size 8.5" (21.5cm) vs. the 7.5" (19 cm) of the Fissler Vitavit.  It is nice and deep and has two handles that stay out of the way.

Fagor made this steamer basket extra special by capitalizing on the holes that need to be there anyway and turning it into a grater- helpful in a pinch but not ergonomic enough to become your primary grater.

fagor futuro accessories

Also included is a small recipe book, with color photographs and recipes and a very detailed instruction manual.

Sold Separately:
Other Details:  
  • 18/10 Stainless Steel with aluminum sandwich base 
  • Available Sizes: 4, 6 and 10qt
  • Spring Valve with dial pressure selector (8 and 15 PSI)  
  • Universal Base - Safe to use on gas, electric, ceramic and induction cook tops
  • Width: (opening) 8.8" or 22.5cm,  (widest point) 9.25" or 23.5 cm; Height (internal) 6" or 15.5cm; Weight:  (Base) 4.14lbs or 1.88k , (Base and Top) 6.28lbs or 2.85k
  • 10 Year Warranty
  • Made in Spain
  • Fagor Futuro Instruction Manual 
  • Manufacturer Website: Fagor America
  • Recipes on this website using Fagor Futuro

Conclusion and Score: 

The Futuro has the best pressure release I have seen, yet.  It's quiet, really automatic (you can walk away while it is releasing pressure instead of pushing a button for two minutes to release pressure), and best of all the vapor goes in the right direction (straight up into my exhaust fan).  The shape of the base is the next-best feature.  I was able to fit roasts in the Futuro  that would have otherwise been cooked diagonally in other pressure cookers. But, unless you have a well-trained ear, it's a bit of a surprise when it reaches pressure and it needs a bit more heat than its peers to stay there.

The Futuro is fun to use and well.accessorized but compared to other premium cookers it's not the most efficient in terms of energy consumption.

To Purchase: 



From U.K (similar model with different base).:   




Have you used this pressure cooker?
Add to this review by leaving your comments, below!


Our relationship with a manufacturer, or lack thereof, does not affect the outcome of the pressure cooker reviews.  In the interest of full disclosure, we would like to note that: 

The equipment used for testing has been sent to hip pressure cooking by Fagor at no cost. On occasion, Fagor makes links to Hip Pressure Cooking recipes from their facebook page, and Hip Pressure Cooking has contributed some content to the recipe book sold with the Fagor Elite.

share this hip page!
Print Friendly and PDF
subscribe by email:

21 comments:

  1. I bought the uk Marco version last Christmas, love it and that's how I found your FB page whilst looking for recipes and ideas, thanks for all your posts, I have now completely re-discovered pressure cooking.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How long does it take to come to pressure, low or high?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Trudy, thanks for stopping by and leaving your feedback on this pressure cooker!

    Lisa, the time to pressure depends on how full the pressure cooker is. For my tests I brought 1 kilo of room temperature water (which is 1 Liter or 4 cups) in a cold (not pre-heated) pressure cooker and the Futuro averaged around 10 minutes. If you pre-heat the pressure cooker, bring the contents to boil and use the minimum amount of liquid (usually 1 cup) the time to pressure is greatly reduced!

    Ciao,

    L

    ReplyDelete
  4. If I remember correctly, when I bought my Kuhn Rikon it was around $100 more than the Fagor on Amazon. Being the skinflint that I am I keep wondering if it was worth that additional $100.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Manufacturers base their retail price on a number of factors, though I have noticed that the country of manufacture and amount of materials have alot to do with it. But these reviews will bring out the non-obvious differences between brands (like efficiency). Kuhn Rikon Duromatic, is next!

    Ciao,

    L

    ReplyDelete
  6. What a coincidence! I actually had one of these, which I bought as a less expensive alternative to Kuhn Rikon. I have to say, honestly, I was not all that happy with the performance. It may have been me, but like you, I found it somehow a chore to get this baby up to pressure and keep it there. Perhaps I was just not used to the design. In any event, I wound up giving it away and buying the Kuhn Rikon anyway…

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Laura, thank you for doing these reviews! I note you are doing Kuhn Rikon next and wonder if you would address some troubleshooting. Since I discovered your page, I have been using mine much more, and noticed an intermittent problem. Not sure if parts need replacing or wrong technique! It's a 2.5L KR which I have used about 2-3x per week over 18 months. I have already replaced the valve housing (the free moving cap)as the plastic legs broke, possibly from putting it in the dishwasher. It now hisses and pushes out steam/fluid without attaining enough pressure to drive the pin up to even the first red line. I tried steaming a small christmas pud last night on a steamer basket with about an inch of water, it got cooked after 10 mins despite the problem with some water still remaining in the pot. I think its a new seal I need, but do you have any other advice?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi again! While I was writing that desperate email to you, my husband lubricated the seal and did a test run with some water only - and it worked! You may have mentioned this tip already in your troubleshooting section somewhere?

    ReplyDelete
  9. One other comment on my Kuhn Rikon is that I have the Top model, which instead of having just that rod with red rings has a plastic "gizmo" on the top; a plastic thing that goes around the part that raises with the red marks on it. The plastic part that goes around is removable but without it you don't know when the center indicator has risen enough.

    What's nice about it is that you can use it to release the steam; pull up the center indicator part and twist it and it locks into an open position. I always start it in that position so that I don't have to sit there and watch it for the first 10 minutes or so; when the water is boiling it makes a lot of hissing noise so then I come back and put it in the normal position and then watch it get up to pressure.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Frank, thanks for adding your experience with this pressure cooker!

    Miss Tammy, so glad you got your Kuhn working again. I'll ask that you share your experience with the valve housing in the comments of the next review. I don't have an official trouble-shooting section (great idea), but often answer questions on the Facebook Page.

    Lumpynose, thanks for your feedback and information on Kuhn's other model. I will ask that you post this in the comments when I publishe that review. And thanks for the grammatical reminder!

    Ciao,

    L

    ReplyDelete
  11. I had to laugh while reading this because I'm still using the Oster pressure cooker I got as a wedding present in 1974!!!! MAN - Pressure cookers have come A LONG way! :) BTW - mine doesn't have a fill line unless you want to count the "use line" that has formed at the 2/3 level due to so much use over the years. Great review!

    ReplyDelete
  12. I received a 10-quart Futuro for Christmas. I've only used it twice, but really like it so far. I'm bit confused about your comments on the pressure indicator, as I didn't see anything in the instructions stating that the pan would need additional time to come up to full pressure even after the indicator popped up. I'm not disagreeing, just saying that I didn't see it. In fact, it would be consistent with my results so far, where I turned down the heat when the indicator popped up and things seemed slightly underdone. Could you point me to where I could the discussion of this in the instructions?

    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  13. mjskit, thanks for your feedback!

    Anonymous, welcome! I'm sorry, I don't understand your question. I can answer any question up to my experience or you can always pose specific questions to the manufacturer as well. In this case, Fagor Facebook Page. They respond quickly and accurately!

    Ciao,

    L

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hi, I have the 6qt. Futuro. Someone must have overheard me express an interest in pressure cooking, I received one for Christmas, 2010. Ever since, I have been popping in on your site, here and there. Your review of the Futuro was a tremendous help to me. As I am new to pressure cooking and the cooker, I was wondering if I was controlling my heat correctly. My cooking times seemed longer than the recipe indicated. I had pressure but was not maintaining the light, steady stream of steam escaping out of the valve. I was trying to use as little energy as possible. I agree with you, I needed more heat to maintain pressure. After reading your review, my last two efforts, although simple, were a success. I appreciate you sharing your knowledge and expertise, I am gaining more confidence with each use. Thanks to you, I am getting hip!

    Dan, in Ohio, USA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm so glad that my information was able to help you get acquainted with your pressure cooker! Leave me comments to let me know which recipes you try and how you like them!

      Ciao,

      L

      Delete
  15. Hi Laura,
    While searching for reviews on p.c.'s, your beautifully done website came up. It's a amazing resource! Love the gorgeous photography. Thank you for testing, rating and sharing your experience with these 2 cookers. Your reviews were very helpful and along with my budget and storage considerations, I purchased a 6 qt. Futuro about 4 weeks ago. Previously I had a vintage 1973 aluminum jiggle top, purchased new, that went to the goodwill a few of years ago. And even tho my Futuro isn't the Mercedes Benz of p.c., I do think it's a Cadillac! I'm very pleased with my cooker, thanks to your tips and then some practice it's really easy to use. So far I've done two test drives and 6 dishes with good results, and a couple of near misses, yeah, it takes a bit of practice, but i'm really enjoying the newer style cooker. I didn't realize just how much I'd missed the flavors created with a p.c.. Now, with the wealth of info here, there's a lot more to try than I ever dreamed of doing with my old cooker. Are the tiered recipes on your site suitable for a 6 qt p.c.?
    Sherry, Indiana, USA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Welcome Sherry, and congratulations on your new pressure cooker. Thank you so much for your comments on the website, I'm really trying to do something different here and I'm so glad that its appreciated!

      Though, I have to admit I have never heard of "tiered recipes" can you tell me more about what those are? Is it stacking things in the cooker, or adding things at different times? Or...!??

      Ciao,

      L

      Delete
  16. Hi Laura, Ooops, I used the wrong terminology. There is a recipe under 'reader recipes' by Lorna Sass, that she calls 'triplex'. In this recipe she has 3 layers. Bottom layer is potatoes, middle layer is meatloaf in the steamer basket set on top of the potatoes, and the top layer is carrots wrapped in tin foil. So it is stacked and cooked together. Are these 'stacked' recipes suitable for a 6 qt. cooker? Or are they designed for the larger cookers? Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ciao Sherry, I don't have a specific category for those kinds of recipes, but I think your end-goal is to make one-pot meal. Under the "course" menu you can find one-pot-meal. Most of the recipes on this website are written for 5 qt/L and above, so your 6qt should do them just fine.

      The only other recipe that comes to mind, that uses triplex cooking is the Three-Bean salad (each bean takes advantage of the different heat in each level to cook perfectly).

      Ciao,

      L

      Delete
  17. Hi
    My daughter in law has a Fagor pressure cooker with the two different pots (smaller and larger). We did a 2.3 lb roast in it for about 50 minutes and a little over two cups of water. The roast was delisous but when we opened the cooker the water was nearly all gone. Why did the water disappear so quickly? (sorry about the spelling) Ed Allen

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ed,

      The liquid in the cooker should have increased and not decreased during cooking! The roast itself would have released about 3/4 cup of liquid per pound (if not more)

      Did the cooker reach pressure (the yellow button popped up)? Did she turn down the heat to medium-low once it did?

      My guess is that either the roast cooked on a high flame and in over-pressure with the safety valve releasing lots of vapor in an attempt to lower the excess pressure generated by the high heat... OR ...the cooker never reached pressure (due to a misplacement or wear of the gasket) and evaporated as much liquid as a pot with a non-pressure top on it.

      Did you notice how much vapor the cooker released during cooking? Was it a wide plume with an umpleasant "khhhhhh" noise, or a thin whisp with a light "ssssst" sound?

      Ciao,

      L

      Delete

Thank you for taking the time to leave a message. I am interested to know if a recipe worked or for you, or not. If not, please leave as many details as possible in your message.